Are You Serious?

Bookmark and Share

images

I met with an SVP of a software company the other day. Our discussion revolved around how his job could be made easier.

I spoke with him about some of the activities that he needed to perform. I then asked for some other areas that were required that he could self identify as being total wastes of time as well as adding no value to the customer. (He was in a sales and business development function, and by his own admission, being customer facing was his most pressing objective.)

He identified a meeting tracking tool as being the bane of his existence. My response,”Tell Me More.”

He went on to say that this tool was mandated by the board, no it was not Saleforce, I asked, and that it was a total waste of time for his entire team. I wondered why as this guy seemed like he was no enemy of tech and he acted like he wished he was using Salesforce.

I asked how he used this internal “tool.” His response was that there is a requirement that each salesperson have a meeting each day and a proposal each week. This tool is where this data is recorded. If the salesperson is tracking at a lesser rate on this activity, there is an alert posited by flashing a red light next to the salesperson’s name. The SVP said that he logs in each day, and if any of his reports are glowing red, then he needs to do something. Otherwise, he logs out and goes on with his day, trying to delight customers.

Of course, this system is not intuitive and requires detailed input, so it will take a few hours of work each week by each salesperson- and from their boss the only reason is so that the light does not flash red. (They still forecast with a spreadsheet- this is merely an activity measurement tool.)

Are you serious? I should mention that the salespeople are all senior with at least 10 years of experience.

I could attack this process on a number of levels, but I will say this. If you treat your people as cogs, some will start acting like easily replaceable parts in your system. By that I mean this kind of “management” will drive good employees away and you will be left with the duds, who are happy to meet their job requirements by entering meaningless data.

How will that grow your business? Companies need to start treating their employees like living, breathing people. If your focus is like this towards your employees, I wonder how they treat their customers?

Shareholder value vs. Stakeholder value

Bookmark and Share

tumblr_kvkugopLxp1qzocyko1_500

In a world driven by human and intellectual capital, traditional Org Charts, Employee Handbooks and most traditional tools that used to help enterprises to run their business have become increasingly unreliable and ineffective. High performance and value creation doesn’t originate from to traditional enterprise tools or new technologies, it originates from focusing on the human side of business.

Jack Welch had it right when he said: “The essence of competitiveness is liberated when we make people believe that what they think and do is important – and then get out of their way while they do it.”

Enterprises face the biggest challenges to humanize their business since their organizations are driven by spreadsheets and shareholder value. As we’ve learned throughout the Great Recession, many companies leveraged their future away by focusing on short-term gains, destroying long-term value over time.

While shareholder value will remain a dominant metric, businesses have to focus their attention more and more on their relationships with customers, employees, partners, and all other stakeholder groups. By investing in these relationships, businesses will be able to create long-term value and, ultimately, shareholder value.

We believe that those organization aspiring to succeed in the current socio-economic environment have to understand holistically who their key stakeholders are and what they want. They have clearly defined strategies to ensure that constant value is delivered to these stakeholders. They have implemented processes to support this strategy and understand the necessary capabilities to execute processes. And they have thought through and communicated what the organization needs from its stakeholders – Loyalty, profitability, investment, etc.

Too often, metrics are derived from strategy. It seems so obvious. But it’s a trap. You can go from A to B directly, pass by C or go from A to D to C and end at B. Strategy is not a destination, it’s a choice of one path you’re going to take. Metrics help you track whether you’re moving in the right direction. Most corporate initiatives are focused on incremental improvements – expand your business to a new market, grow your product line, find new consumers. All these initiatives are developed with the belief that they will enable the business to deliver better value to all its stakeholders. That’s why focusing on the stakeholder perspective is imperative to deliver replicable value, choose the right strategy and exact metrics. When formulating strategies, businesses need to consider the wants and needs of all their stakeholders. This is not limited to primary stakeholders, the view needs to be expanded to the general public, special interest groups, legal and regulatory community. If this broad view of stakeholders is not adopted, businesses run the risk failing to satisfy the needs of their stakeholders, opening themselves up for revenge on multiple Social Media channels.

So, what is the best path for businesses to increase stakeholder value?

1) Stakeholder Satisfaction: Who are the most influential stakeholders and what do they desire?

2) Performance Strategies: What strategies should the organization adopt to ensure the desires of stakeholders are satisfied?

3) Measurement: Metrics are required to track if the chosen strategies are actually implemented. Metrics help to communicate strategies throughout the organization. Metrics combined with incentives help to speed up implementation. And, ultimately, metrics help you determine if the chosen strategy was the right one and if not, why. When the measures are consistent with the organization’s strategies, they encourage behaviors that are consistent with the mission and vision of the business.

4) Align processes with strategies: What processes do we need to put in place to allow the strategies to be executed?

5) Capabilities: What capabilities do we require to operate these processes? Today, tomorrow and in the future?

6) Stakeholder Contribution and Collaboration: What contribution does the business require from its stakeholders to succeed? How can we maintain and enhance these capabilities?

This complex exercise will help your business to face the challenging socio-economic environment and adapt efficiently. Or as Jack Welch said:

“An organization’s ability to learn, and translate that learning into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.”

Re-humanize your salesforce.

Bookmark and Share

creepysalesguyI’ve been hearing a lot of chatter recently in articles, blog posts, and conversations about “Sales 2.0″ and how the automation and “socializing” of the sales process is accelerating sales cycles, making sales people more efficient, improving close ratios, etc.

This sounds great but – How are these processes benefiting the customer and nurturing the relationship between the prospect and seller?

The answer is sadly – very little.

Sales 2.0 does not change what sales people do.

Sales 2.0 help make sales people more efficient while allowing management to better monitor what is going on within their organizations. These are not unimportant, but the crucial piece that is being missed is what is desperately needed across all businesses today – the Human element of the sales process.

Let’s step back from the Sales 2.0 discussion and focus on actual sales humans. Imagine an average salesperson that is tasked with cold calling, blind emailing prospects, attending industry conferences and networking events to drum up new business for a technology company. This salesperson calls, emails, and schmoozes his/her way around town but every time a prospect picks up the phone, reads their email, or sees them walk into the room – the prospect cringes with disdain. This is the reality with the majority of sales interactions in the U.S.

How do we change this?

Let’s lose the term ‘Sales’ altogether. Really? Yes! Instead, think about what matters most in a business (or personal) interaction – the Relationship.
Focus on the key components of a Relationship Manager. Here are a few important ones:

1) Educate don’t Evangelize - The time for convincing someone that you have the latest and greatest is over. Instead educate yourself on your prospect/clients’ business, their needs, hopes, and dreams. In turn, you can educate your prospect/client on your product and/or service as it might fit toward their needs (based on what you’ve learned and not on what you think they need driven by your sales or call quota).

2) Advise don’t Aggress – Become a trusted adviser and advocate for your customer. Instead of utilizing scare tactics & disturbing questions , build trust and value with them. If your solution isn’t the best fit for the organization, be honest and say so. That honesty will pay you back ten fold in the long run.

and for Sales Management

3) Mentor don’t Manage – Instead of managing your sales staff by spreadsheet or Salesforce reports, trying fostering relationship building behavior with your team and mentor them toward its ultimate goal of respect and trust. Additionally, all Sales Management should be building their own relationships and helping to expand the relationships of their team. If your Sales Management is spending the majority of their time managing internal processes, you need to take a closer look at how that is benefiting the relationships with your customers/prospects.

Don’t get me wrong, there are amazing, talented, thoughtful sales people out there. Unfortunately, they are still the minority. Take a closer look within your organization and evaluate how your sales people, processes, and management are effecting your prospects and customers. Are they building relationships or perpetuating negative stereotypes? If the later, it may be time to re-humanize.