Bookmark and Share

5695ec3756df47e1b1198a9074bf604fd6bc423b_m

I’ve been interested in investing and macro-economy after I lost my shirt wasting money before the dot-com bubble burst. (eToys, anyone?) That came in handy in the last few years, helped me understand where we are going from here and how one can profit from these challenges. Bubbles are very common symptoms of a misaligned system and when you’re not prepared for their explosion or deflation, you will get hurt and suffer.

So, let’s talk about the imminent Social Crash.

More and more people are using social channels. This trend will continue, I don’t foresee people going back to their traditional ways. The tools will change, how people will use the tools will change and how brands will engage with people will change. (Let’s hope.) Social Marketing is a toddler, temper tantrums and amazement over little things (Oooh, Facebook integrated Skype: GAMECHANGER!) included.

It’s a pretty safe bet to say that the big players of the industry will be fine: Facebook, Twitter, Zynga and the other few billion dollar players. They might lose a huge chunk of their valuation over time but the Zuckerberg’s of the world will be doing well.

I’m not worried about them.

I’m worried about the smaller guys.

The social media consultants, the little shops that evangelize Social Marketing and execute smaller initiatives. The ones that struggle to get a $5,000 project and make a tiny profit from it. And all the startups that bank on social remaining to be the next big thing. The entrepreneurs building the new Twitter. (The next big thing won’t be social, trust me. It will have social features but the focus won’t be social.)

I suspect all of them will be gone in no time.

Why?

The more social the Web becomes, the less valuable weak connections and relationships will be.

Most social initiatives disappoint. They don’t perform as expected, don’t result in a measurable ROI or are plagued with extremely high expectations. The aftermath will make clients gun-shy. And make them move their money to more buttoned-up shops, firms that are part of a bigger network with access to analytics tool and other capabilities to make better informed decisions.

The majority of brands are starting to understand that social media experts are too limited in their capabilities. They desire a holistic, integrated approach that regards Social Marketing as one part of the marketing mix and not the holy grail of marketing.

The social space is moving on from media to social business. You need to understand the enterprise space, organizational structures and have deep insights into current CRM systems to be able to play in this new field.

The overall feeling in the market place is that anybody can do Social Media.

That’s the moment when the bubble goes “BOOM”. In the dot-com bubble, everybody thought they were Warren Buffett. During the housing bubble, everybody thought they could flip a house. And, now everybody believes to be a Social Marketing expert.

The crash is imminent. Maybe next month VC’s will stop investing in social sites. Maybe next year the majority of small shops focusing on Twitter pages will close down. It might happen any moment. But it will happen.

How to emerge victorious after the imminent Social Crash.

Don’t have all your fortunes tied up in high-risk social platforms like Facebook or Twitter. Diversify. Spread your investments to other platforms.

Diversify around user behavior. It changes constantly. Who knew people would check into places and expect discounts 5 years ago? Are you sure they will continue to do so in 12 months?

Think outside your current capabilities/expertise. Just ask the HTML programmers that received a BMW as a signing bonus in 2000 and flipped burgers in 2002. Educate yourself constantly.

Eliminate loss leaders. You might be comfortable building Facebook pages for smaller clients but is it profitable? Do you spend too much time with one client and don’t get enough in return? Time to cut ties.

If you’re struggling now; exit today. It won’t get easier. Time to move on.

Learn from Joseph P. Kennedy

The father of JFK, Bobby and Ted Kennedy saw his wealth increase from $4 million to $180 million. ($2.8 billion in today’s money.) These years were the dog days of the depression: 1929 to 1935.

When nobody wanted to invest in Real Estate, he doubled up by looking for value.

He diversified (liquor after the prohibition ended, reorganizing and refinancing several Hollywood studios) and developed  powerful business networks.

Now, I know that many things done by Joseph P. Kennedy were unethical (insider trading, just to name one) but my point is that there are amazing opportunities once Social crashes. Capitalism is about creative destruction.

When the dot-com bubble burst, the Internet population continued to grow. People became more digital. And new ventures were born. History will repeat itself after the Social Crash. The Social Web will continue to prosper. It will become less media and more business, part of the collaborative enterprise.

You can prosper, too. If you prepare for a crash now and get your affairs in order.

Unfortunately, the majority of people don’t believe in crashes, just in minor corrections.

From where I sit, they look like lemmings heading towards a bluff, beneath them only the cold, stormy sea.

Don’t be one of them.

Bookmark and Share

2947a1ff1a340ad0896c59c6a3cfb1a75f23672b_m

A few weeks I wrote about “The Shanty Towns of Social Marketing”:

“It’s a world filled with anarchy, impenetrable walls that make it hard for people from the outside to see what’s going inside and it’s an unethical world. In this world, you can buy Facebook fans by the thousands. You can ask them to “like” your brand in exchange for goods. They give you options to download your pricey apps in exchange for credits. Need 10,000 more LinkedIn fans? That creepy guy with the fedora and mink coat can help you. Have to pump up your follower number on Twitter by 100,000? Enter the greasy door next to the red neon sign, flashing “Open”. It’s a shanty town comprised of people who work for improvised, unsustainable companies that might go out of business any day.

An island filled with bottom-feeders, preying on the innocent. And supporting the cynical and unethical marketers.”

Either Mr. Gingrich didn’t read my post (likely) or he read the post and got a “good” idea (unlikely): No matter what, it seems Mr. Gingrich and his team (allegedly) were buying fake  Twitter followers. PeekYou dug a little bit deeper and they concluded that just 8% of Newt Gingrich’s followers are real people.

Mhm.

I briefly glanced at Mr. Gingrich’s followers and, well, it doesn’t look good.

Screen shot 2011-08-02 at 4.34.02 PM

The egg screen of death.

What about Obama?

Screen shot 2011-08-02 at 4.44.56 PM

Some eggs but not as eggtastic as Newt. But that’s just silly me, having a glance.

PeekYou went even further and analyzed the GOP 2012 contenders for comparison: Still, 8% of Gingrich’s followers are real, 20% real followers for Sarah Palin and Pawlenty tops the chart with 32% real followers. (Allegedly.)

I’m glad this happened.

Not many people have written about the rotten eggs of Social Marketing. It finally sheds a bright light on this unethical practice. (Especially when you boast about the number of followers.)

Clearly, Mr. Gingrich uses the follower count to stroke his own ego and get attention/respect from the clueless press. That’s about it.

A high number of fans is meaningless if no one ever shares your stuff or does anything to advance your cause.

Who knows, this might be the beginning of the end for these silly services. It’s a definite wake-up call for agencies and their clients to have a second look at their Social Marketing strategy. Especially when all you see is the egg screen of death.

Bookmark and Share

tumblr_lgc24g6NE91qzxhoso1_500

When you ask people who’s running the United States, you will get many answers. The most common one is: “The President”. A popular one will be: “Wall Street.”

There’s no wrong answer. The first answer provided me a data point/a fact, the second offered me an insight.

Brands don’t care about data. They want insights.

Brands are clamoring for insights. They built their own CRM systems, work with media companies that add more data sets and are starting to tap into the social conversations. Just to get more data. And no insights. Brands spend millions on surveys, research, data mining, data analysis, focus groups, brand experts – and what they get are facts. Self-congratulating facts to keep things the way they are, rather than mind-boggling, enterprise-changing insights.

The false promise of Social Marketing

We just analyze social conversations about our brand as well as the competitive space and we finally get the insights we were waiting for, right?

Wrong.

Mining social conversations will get you a lot of data. A lot of sentiments. A lot of analysis. But when the agency or technology provider comes to the conclusion slide, you’ll only get facts. Interesting facts, maybe. But not insightful or valuable enough to transform your brand. To steer the brand ship into a new direction.

How to get real insights

The likelihood that pure observation and analysis of social conversation will offer actionable insights is extremely low. I’d rather invest $50,000 in the California lottery than investing $50,000 in research based on that premise.

You have to start out by asking the right questions, go way beyond pure observation. Why do have people stronger relationships with vertical A and not your vertical? What drives them to fall in love with a brand, what are the emotional drivers? Can we transfer those drivers to our brand? When do customers fall in love with your brand? When do they fall out of love, divorce or write threatening letters? What part of your mission and vision connects with people? Insights come from an open mind.

Agencies and technology providers have to listen to people and the brand. Be empathetic to the truth of who they are. Understand the soul of the brand and then make that soul more relevant to a greater number of people.

If you want to transform your brand, you need to step away from the data pile.

Nobody has ever discovered an insight on a spread sheet.

Expand the idea of what an insight is, ask the right questions and listen.

“Only he who can see the invisible can do the impossible.”

Open your eyes.


The Shanty Towns of Social Marketing

Bookmark and Share

cbd419562073c8b45392beec3258d02057bc7a6f_m

When you think of the Social Marketing landscape as a city, you see a lot of beautiful, innovative and glitzy buildings, whole business districts powered by the Social Web, public squares where people discuss freely with brands and communities that try to make the world a better place.

You walk past these beauties and suddenly the landscape turns ugly and desolate. Small communities filled with abandoned Twitter feeds and Facebook pages, big loudspeakers blasting out commercial messages to no living soul, communities disappearing before our eyes because they were built on quicksand.

And then you enter Snake Plissken’s island.

It’s a world filled with anarchy, impenetrable walls that make it hard for people from the outside to see what’s going inside and it’s an unethical world. In this world, you can buy Facebook fans by the thousands. You can ask them to “like” your brand in exchange for goods. They give you options to download your pricey apps in exchange for credits. Need 10,000 more LinkedIn fans? That creepy guy with the fedora and mink coat can help you. Have to pump up your follower number on Twitter by 100,000? Enter the greasy door next to the red neon sign, flashing “Open”. It’s a shanty town comprised of people who work for improvised, unsustainable companies that might go out of business any day.

An island filled with bottom-feeders, preying on the innocent. And supporting the cynical and unethical marketers.

Once again: It’s about quality, not quantity

Agencies are under immense pressure to perform, to deliver measurable results. Just like paid media campaigns, Social Marketing initiatives can fail. It’s part of our business. But, clients need wins. They need (and should require) incremental profits. Or, at least they need a good metric to communicate a win to executive management.

55,000 new “likes” in a month sounds great, right?

100,000 new followers on Twitter must translate to some sales, correct?

250,000 views on YouTube is worth something, isn’t it?

Fact is, these bottom feed feeders deliver nothing more than a number. More often than not, these new followers will unfollow you within a week or so. Or they’re just bots. One thing I can guarantee: They will NEVER buy your product. They will NEVER read your status updates. They will NEVER join the conversation. They will NEVER be of any value.

I get pitches from Snake Plissken’s island each and every day. Your agency does, too.

Just make sure they never paid a visit to the island. If they did, make sure you escape from that agency as fast as you can.

Bookmark and Share

7e4f4ca7458bd47ba6e2b4c01ef1be6b46a1f06c_m

Tom Webster posted on his blog an interesting experience with a highly personal “Influencer Outreach Program“. In short: He tried to give the quake victims in New Zealand moral support by asking his social graph and tapping into the sphere of influencers to record a short message of support. He asked people like Chris Brogan and Oliver Blanchard to spread the word for him, extending his reach dramatically. (So far, so good. Solid outreach program.)

As he writes:

“You see, how this story is supposed to end is this: hundreds of thousands of people heard my plea for help, and overwhelmed my server with messages of hope. The number of messages and the outpouring of passion and love for this cause brought the Interwebs to its knees. The people of New Zealand clung to those messages of hope – and another social media legend was born.”

Well, the results were abysmal (read his post for more details):

  • 410,00+ impressions
  • 389 clicks
  • CTR of below 0.01%
  • 10 submissions (0.0025 action rate)

And you thought your display ad performance blows.

A few thoughts:

First and foremost, I would like to commend Tom for posting these results. I love the honesty of bare numbers and his lack of trying to explain it away. We need more of this.
His experiment doesn’t mean an Influencer Outreach Program on Twitter makes no sense. However it tells us that an Influencer Outreach program on Twitter based on reach will most likely fail.
As Matt Ridings points out, the effort wasn’t designed well enough. “Instead, he notes that “people need to a) see that the influencer took the action (the influencer truly believes) b) be presented with an action simple enough for them to easily participate and allow competition to take hold (“I can make a better audio clip than you did,”) and c) see results made public to allow a & b to occur in such a way that they believe the influencer will actually see that they did it for *them* vs. the cause, thus garnering attention for themselves.”
I would add to this: People are lazy. Tom asked too much from them. Audio message, downloading, sending. When people are asked to do anything more than to click a link, you’ll have problems converting them. That’s the genius of Foursquare: You have nothing to do, waiting for your drink, standing around and you push 2 buttons. Done. The Haiti mobile giving campaign of $10 worked so well because it took me no effort to do it.
People are trained in certain behavior. We do click on links when on Twitter but do we want to take real action? I would argue not. An idea like this might spread better on Facebook where people are used to do more than just click.
While some people rely on Oliver Blanchard to get his take on Social Media ROI and Chris Brogan to get insights into Social Media, their influence out of their field of expertise is very limited. They might be able to shill a suitcase or a book that is closely associated to their expertise but how many people would buy pants because Chris Brogan wears them? Or record a call? I know, this was for a good cause – still.
It clearly shows that you need to connect with the small pools of influencers that create behavior change. It’s more important to have avid fans than amass fans. Think Howard Stern. He’s the ultimate influencer.
Last but not least: Asking people for favors on social platforms is the new spam: Put this in your status. Copy that. Color your avatar green. RT this. Share that. Help here. Donate there. It’s tough to break through that clutter and get meaningful responses.